Anya meeting with the oligarchs after getting a copy of the economic plan from Vasya. Now,--Oh! And Olya is going to Italy with Dmitry, that was true from execrable S1 E1. Dmitry also paid off the government's debts on something. "He found the money," Olya tells Vasya.--Now as I was saying, I am just going on what I don't know of the Ukrainian people, their optimism, their good heartedness, and I think lovely, oh! so lovely, Anya there is going to turn out to be a betrayer, not of Vasya but of the oligarchs. Although an oligarchs plant, Anya, I think, has become "corrupted" by Vasya's honesty and his sincerity in cleaning up corruption. So, more sides to the ethical Rubik's Cube: Dmitry, Olya's lover, paying off government debt and taking her, the government finance minister, to Italy. Is that unethical? We in the U.S. would say that was a conflict of interest. But is it even that? Where is the conflict? We would say there is the "appearance of impropriety", perhaps. And now, in my theory, Anya betraying trust of corrupters for honesty's sake. If that is what she's doing she's not doing it as a double agent for the state, like cops can infiltrate the Mob, she's doing it on her own. Is that still betrayal? Is it still unethical?