Clemson dropped two places in the Associated Press poll of scholarly tackle football teams. TWO. You lose at home, and in a home nicknamed "Death Valley" to an unranked team and you drop a measly two places?
Meanwhile, Pitt? Nine votes for top 25. NINE. The "Beloveds" have now played and lost on the last play of the game at current #13 Oklahoma State; played and beat now ninth-ranked Penn State in Pittsburgh; played and beat, on the last play of the game, now #5, yesterday #2, Clemson in Clemson; played and lost, on the last play of the game, to North Carolina (15 votes, good for 26th) in Klan Kountry.
I totally get Pitt not being ranked! They don't pass the eye test, can't play defense, and have lost four times for crissakes, the one I left out was the stinker in Miami.
So that team, shield your eyes, coming off a 51-23 pasting by unranked, then and now, Miami, goes into Death Valley, beats the supposebly second-best team in America 2.0 and "alleged" #2 is "penalized" by dropping two whole spots in the rankings?
I totally don't get that.
Meanwhile, Pitt? Nine votes for top 25. NINE. The "Beloveds" have now played and lost on the last play of the game at current #13 Oklahoma State; played and beat now ninth-ranked Penn State in Pittsburgh; played and beat, on the last play of the game, now #5, yesterday #2, Clemson in Clemson; played and lost, on the last play of the game, to North Carolina (15 votes, good for 26th) in Klan Kountry.
I totally get Pitt not being ranked! They don't pass the eye test, can't play defense, and have lost four times for crissakes, the one I left out was the stinker in Miami.
So that team, shield your eyes, coming off a 51-23 pasting by unranked, then and now, Miami, goes into Death Valley, beats the supposebly second-best team in America 2.0 and "alleged" #2 is "penalized" by dropping two whole spots in the rankings?
I totally don't get that.