Tuesday, July 21, 2015

"Man Charged With Plotting to Kill U.S. Serviceman in Britain." New York Times.

Episcopalian? (54% in Britain).
Catholic? (17%)
Methodist? (5%)
Presbyterian? (5%)
Baptist? (2%)
Jewish? (2%)
Hindu? (2%)
Muslim? (2%)

The man, Junead Ahmed Khan, who was arrested a week ago, appeared in a London court on Tuesday. Between August 2014 and last May, prosecutors said, he and his uncle had planned to travel to Syria and join the Islamic State militant group.-NYT

Now I know what you're thinking! Let's not jump to any conclusions! Let's be fair! 

It would seem fair to narrow the above list down to say...those at 2% on accounta Junead wanted to join ISIS (or whatever), no? So we'll do that. Next, personally, I know of no Baptists named Khan so let's rule out Baptists. Baptists, be gone. And with Baptists gone we have ruled out Christians. Which leaves us with two semitic groups and one subcontinent possibility. Based once again purely upon personal esperience I have known several Jews named Kahn, but not Khan. And no Junead Ahmed's. Icksnay Jewish, proving that we are not anti-semitic.  Hindu or Muslim? Eenie-meenie miney-mohammad. But wait! Is not "Khan" a Hindu name? "Shere Khan" from Jungle Book? Is ISIS (or whatever) an equal opportunity recruiter? May anyone join? 

"UK charges two Asians with plotting against US military."-Hindustan Times (London).

Lolol. I see said the blind man! Leetle DEFENSIVE are we not, HINDUSTAN Times?! 

Check out the basis for our amigo-enemy Hindustan Times' headline:

Both men are from Luton, near London. [Shazib Ahmed the other.] Junead Ahmed Khan was also charged with allegedly planning to attach (sic) US military personnel posted in UK. Luton has a large population of Asian origin.


Lolol. At this typing there is no confirmation that the Ahmeds are students of the Koran as opposed to the Bhagavad Gita and there is some conflict in the "evidence."