Erling Haaland's buzz cut is a top story in Associated Press. Blink.
City WON! :o Two late goals, Marc Guéhi in the 84' and Joško Gvardiol in extra time and God's Righteous Angels in Sky Baloo win their first EPL match under Enzo Maresca. 2-1 the final at Etihad Stadium.
Donald J. Trump
@realDonaldTrump
Canada wants the benefits of being a State, without being one!!! They have also charged our great farmers, for many years, massive amounts of Tariffs. No more!!! President DJT
Aug 23, 2026, 1:06 AM
I also got along well with lawyers on the other side and had too much respect for them to insult them.
Man, I was a terrible negotiator as a lawyer. When a prosecutor, I never made a plea offer. I required the defense to make an offer to me. Of course they had to do their ethical duty and complete discovery. Of course I was under an ethical duty to participate in good faith plea negotiations. But my definition of good faith negotiations did not include bluffing. They made me an offer, I said yes or no and countered. If they said no, that was end of good faith negotiations and we would go to trial. I wasn't being a putz for being a putz' sake. Trial preparation is intense and extremely time and energy consuming. I wasted too much time in my earlier years preparing a case for trial only to have it plead out when the defense saw the whites of the jurors' eyes.
I am constitutionally unsuited for and would not have done what both sides did in the U.S.-Canada trade negotiations. Spend a week in what I think are good faith, fruitful negotiations only to find out at the last minute that I was getting my chain jerked? No and hell no. I never was suited for diplomacy.
Update: Chicken con Carney to go with TACO?
I believe the answer to "Why?" is gamesmanship. Carney is taking a page out of Trump's go big to go small "negotiating strategy". Points one and two below are correct. Number three is wrong. Carney's threatened tariffs go into effect SEPTEMBER 8.🙄 Carney may well follow through on his own tariffs but there is no way Mark Carney, professional economist and Canada's guardian, is going to tariff the Toilet Nation out of spite for Trump. Trump threatened 50% tariffs a month ago. Carney walked away from negotiations and those tariffs went into effect. That's a L for Canadians. But it will be short-lived. It's still risky for the Canadian people but Carney has got sixteen days until his bluff is called, as Trump's was Friday night. Considering how close they were this week, that is an eternity to negotiate the details left.
Carney's better play imo would have been to announce his his own tariffs the day after Trump announced his. Then both sides would have had tariffs triggered to go into effect and Carney could have negotiated from some strengthened position.
But Carney didn't take this sage, after-the-fact advice. There now is risk for the negotiators in this duel of the chickens. Who calls who first? There are going to be Iran-like claims by both sides. "Carney called me and BEGGED for new negotiations." Mr. Prime Minister, don't take the bait. Be an adult. No more games. Just. Get. It. Done.
9:57 pm, August 22
Canadian Pencil: "Why does it feel like today Mark Carney is going to war (pause), trade war, the tone?"
Carney: "Because we were attacked."
(47:58 of video linked in previous post)
"We were attacked"? The 50% tariffs were an attack? It was hardly a Pearl Harbor-like surprise. Trump announced a month ago 50% were going to happen if an agreement wasn't reached. That's what the deadline was about.
I watched all of Carney's speech, I'm not as familiar, obviously, with his tone as a veteran Canadian journalist would be, but I didn't get that from tone.
It does puzzle me, the collapse of the negotiations, that has puzzled me ever since I read about it. I did get the sense from reading every article that I could that "today" Carney was different. Nothing that I read said that he was different today, it was just the penumbras and emanations. It's also who he is.
1) Carney is one of the most esteemed practicing professional economists of his time. This is going to hurt the Canadian economy more than it will the American. Carney said today that this coming week he will announce retaliatory tariffs on the U.S. Jamieson Greer, the lead U.S. negotiator said today they were working on a retaliation to Carney's retaliation. Are we all six years old? Canada was "attacked" today and Canadians got hurt; Canadians will be hurt more when Carney's retaliatory tariffs go into effect; they will be hurt more when the American retaliation to Canada's retaliatory tariffs kick in. I can't balance my checkbook but I know enough economics to know that this tit-for-tat is the classic trade war cycle where everyone gets hurt.
2) Carney is a politician. He's the Prime Minister of Canada. His constituents, and some of his fellow politicians, are royally pissed at the U.S.--with eminent, multiple good reasons. But this is going to hurt Canadians.
When rationality fails...
3) Carney is also human. It just seems to me that "today" there was a wire that was tripped and Carney just pulled the plug. He did pull the plug. Late Friday night, before the 12:01 am Saturday deadline, he ordered his negotiating team back to Ottawa. The deadline had been extended once, by Trump. Maybe they couldn't ask for another extension, I don't know. The shock of this...everyone was taken by surprise. Trump had announced the extension because there was a "DEAL!" Carney was not as certain but was positive. I'm not saying that Carney was at fault, just "Why does it feel like today Mark Carney is going to war?"
This has been a fucked up day.
Iran suing for peace? ابدا. Other "politicians" than the president and speaker mentioned by Wally, and the guys with the guns, the IRGC, said no. The state broadcaster, IRIB backs the IRGC. Trump is correct: there really is a leadership crisis in Iran.
A new "war" with Canada? I have to slap the New York Times for that headline. Mark Carney did not say in his speech that his country and the Toilet Nation were at war. At the end of the speech he took questions. The next to last, and the the last in English, was "Why does it feel like Mark Carney is going to war (pause), trade war, the tone?" There was one last question in French and I did hear Carney say "guerre", but the context was trade war. Trump is not going to toilet-bomb Canada.
Christ, what a Saturday.
The Fat Cuban Horse agreed to a buyout of Klay Thompson's contract. The former Splash Bro. has been a target since the Giannis trade and is expected to sign with us.
I disagree with DSA fundamentally, on socialism, but one thing they are is democratic.
Some perfectly fine Democrats have been defeated in primaries by Lefties. These are loyal, cobalt blues, nothing purplish about them, in Congressional Districts safe from challenge by Grand Old Phascists, in entire states where the Democrat would be favored to win the Senate seat. In some cases these Democrats have been incumbents. They have proven their nous time and time again, including in Trump's two impeachments. They wore their impeachment votes as badges of honor. Still they were primaried from the Left, in some cases lost. Why would that be? Let's hear from an incumbent Dem.:
"Members now realize that it's [impeachment] not that big of a deal. It's old hat...Especially when you can't deliver."
You don't get an "A" for effort any more; "Resistance" doesn't cut it any more. You need to win. After Trump's second presidential win, some incumbent Resistance Democrats faced angry constituents who demanded "blood in the streets", even their blood when they went back to their districts. The impeachment incumbents were shocked.
What this means is that Republican voters have lost faith in democratic theory, where the democratic process legitimizes the outcome; in fact, it is the only legitimizing process. It means that Republican voters from 2016 to present and increasing numbers of Democratic voters have lost faith in the two political parties to deliver them results. Republicans have totally abandoned democratic process. Democrats have not, but want results. Small d democratic theory is that you can't win every time, you have to compromise, and you have to accept the results of free and fair votes. As Hubert Humphrey once stated, "Dukakis thinks as long as the pipes are shiny it doesn't matter if shit comes out". That was an American-context critique of democratic theory. Sheepish political scientists would point to broader examples, such as the elections in Germany in the 1930's. No, the Nazi Party never won a majority of seats in the Reichstag, but like in Germany at the time, like in Israel throughout its history, close counts in horseshoes, hand grenades and parliamentary democracies. The theory in parliamentary democracies is that pluralities force compromise and you get a muddier, but better, representation of the whole electorate. So, although political scientists don't like to mention it, Adolph Hitler and Benjamin Netanyahu were the results that proved that democracies work. You can see why poli sci's don't like to talk about that.
Coming back to America, we have a quasi first-past-the-poll representative democracy. At the presidential level you do have to win a majority of electoral votes, but to accommodate the smaller, slave-holding states, you can win the electoral college and the presidency without winning a majority of the popular vote. Voila! Donald Trump. The pipes were shiny in 2016 and 2024. We still got shit. And, like in Germany and present-day Israel, shiny democratic pipes may result in the death of Democracy in America.
When all that you want to do is win and you can't, the focus is on the process of democracy as the culprit. Trump would not have accepted the legitimizing democratic process in 2016 had he lost the Electoral College (he did lose the popular vote); Trump, and a majority of congressional Republicans, did not accept the democratic process in 2020; they would not have accepted it in 2024; they might not except it in 2026. To him and them, only the result mattered. Meanwhile, Trump never, in three elections, got a majority of the popular vote.
When one side doesn't accept democratic process and the other side does, you have an unfair fight. The rise of Democratic Socialism is a response to Trumpism, but DSA is wholly committed to democratic process. They want to abolish the Electoral College to make Democracy in America more democratic. DSA is also as wholly committed to results as Trumpism. Democrats of all shades are fed up with the unfair fight. DSA offers them a democratic alternative within the Democratic Party. Resistance isn't enough, "especially when you can't deliver."
Shatiya Hardin, Gary Ind. resident 25 years Gary has been without power for nine straight days after an August 11 storm. 🥹🫶
Sound on. Off my triumph a half hour earlier, Eleven was spoiling for a rematch with war-like tunneling under the bed covers. But when I gave it to her, 11:05, she was so skittish, owing to my new strategy of not giving her advance warning with ominous knocks and finger drumming, that she folded like a paper suitcase and gave me a pitiful white flag meow. In the second at 11:08 she holds her position till I jump out and then she skedaddles. She'll get on to me. She's the most fun I've had in years and years.
Eleven and I just got done playing our nightly "I'm gonna get that kitty" surprise game and she was MAD at me because I won. I changed my routine and she really was surprised! After we were done I lay down on the bed. She came into the bedroom and GLARED at me. 🤭No fake, I laughed so hard my back hurt.🤣
Early in his second term, Trump told his team that Harp "was the only one who loved him as much as his wife and his kids," according to Regime Change, a new book by New York Times reporters Maggie Haberman and Jonathan Swan.
“All of you will go off and make money,” Trump said, according to the book. “She’ll never leave me.”
Haberman and Times reporter Jonathan Swan also wrote in their book “Regime Change,” released in July, that Harp left “adoring” and “intimate” letters to Trump that “raised the eyebrows of the Secret Service during the campaign,” Swan told CNN last month.
Preston [Harp, brother], 38, who now lives in Nicaragua, said he believes his sister sees Trump as "a kind of father figure" because their real father, (https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/natalie-harp-brother-says-trump-105252843.html) Robert Harp, who died by suicide in July 2020, had moved away from what Preston described as the "doctrine of U.S. exceptionalism." [Preston said Natalie's relationship with Trump was] "very unhealthy".
Mr. Trump has dismissed concerns about Ms. Harp, whom he calls “sweetie” and treats like a daughter, according to people close to him.
Donald Trump's executive assistant Natalie Harp is the woman behind his overnight Truth Social sprees, The Wall Street Journal (https://www.wsj.com/politics/trump-truth-social-late-night-posts-167cb47a) reported Tuesday.
Once, when Mr. Trump was playing golf in Scotland, she ran behind his cart to keep him up to date with positive stories and social media posts.
In 2023, Ms. Harp sent a series of letters to Mr. Trump that unnerved people around him, according to a half-dozen people with knowledge of them.
"You are all that matters to me,” she wrote in one of the letters, which were seen by The New York Times. The letters’ authenticity was confirmed by two people with direct knowledge of them.
“I don’t ever want to let you down,” Ms. Harp wrote, thanking Mr. Trump for being her “Guardian and Protector in this Life.”
In another letter, she told Mr. Trump that she wanted to get back to “that synergy” she used to have with him, where “we’d talk about everything and nothing.”
“I want to bring you joy,” she wrote, “to feel like we can get through a day without ever having to talk ‘work.’”
President Trump took aim at Oman, a U.S. ally that has been mediating the talks, as efforts to end a war he started have faltered.
Memorandum of Misunderstanding Kaput: 60-Day Period for Full Agreement With Iran Expires
The White House Criminal is incompetent in everything except crime.