Thursday, June 17, 2021
Wednesday, June 16, 2021
I googled Professor Bailyn a couple of times after I last read Ideological Origins, holding my breath each time as the search engine loaded. "Was" or "is"? He was in his 90's. But then I stopped. I thought to do it several times since but didn't. Dread. When I picked up Ideological Origins again just now I scolded myself into checking and found out.
COVID-19 BIDEN+145,146 (June 14, 15)
Tuesday, June 15, 2021
Monday, June 14, 2021
They Love the Car That People Love to Hate
The utilitarian Yugo may be the most maligned auto in history, ridiculed for its looks and its (many) flaws. “We really need tougher slander laws in this country,” one Yugo defender says.
[The] Yugo….has been called “hard to view on a full stomach”, …and “something assembled at gunpoint”.
You might go so far as to say it was “an out-and-out vile little car,” as Eric Peters did in his book “Automotive Atrocities”…
Mr. Pierce [we need tougher slander laws] is one of the Yugo’s more assertive fans, who defend the car’s reputation with the overprotective affection usually reserved for pet cats that go blind and three-legged dogs.
😂
Valerie Hansen of Columbus, Ohio… said she was attracted to the Yugo for two reasons. First, it speaks to her ancestral Balkan roots. Second, its mechanical simplicity means she can do her own repairs. “You can fix a Yugo with a butter knife and a rubber band,” she said.😂
…The review from the ordinarily staid Consumer Reports verged on cruelty. The engine “struggled and strained to climb highway grades in high gear.” On acceleration, “Our 0-60-m.p.h. run took 18.5 seconds.” The transmission? “Easily the worst we’ve encountered in years.” The interior was “covered with cloth that resembles towel material.”
😂
On the other hand, “it’s easy to turn on the high beams when you’re trying to signal a left turn.”In Mr. Bricklin’s telling, Pininfarina ended its contract with him as part of a deal to make the Allanté Pininfarina for Cadillac, leaving him one car short of what he promised dealers. “So I put somebody in charge of finding the cheapest car in the world”…
It was found in Yugoslavia. Mr. Bricklin went there and encountered “that piece of crap factory with 50,000 people that should have 2,000 people, 127 Communist unions,” he recalled.
…
It is a tenet of the faithful that the car would have made it if not for those jokes, a staple of Mr. Leno’s “Tonight Show” routines…
“Yugo has come out with a very clever anti-theft device,” went one Leno gag. “They made their name bigger.”
… Even now car enthusiasts can summon gibes like: “You know why the Yugo has a standard rear window defogger? To keep your hands warm while you push it.”
…
When David Lang bought a Yugo GVX in 2018, one of his goals was to drive it across Michigan’s Mackinac Bridge, notorious for a Yugo that went out of control and over the side in 1989, killing the driver.
“People are like, ‘Don’t take it over the Mackinac Bridge!’” said Mr. Lang, who lives in Brown City, Mich.
It was coincidentally on an anniversary of the accident. People reacted as if he were jumping the car over 19 flaming buses, he said.
😂
“That was the first thing I did with it.”…
Nick Bygrave…found a moss-covered 1987 GVS that had sat in a field for 20 years, but it ran. Once the moss died, it looked like a matte paint job.
😁
…In 1986, Noce Cadillac in Chicago offered a free Yugo with a purchase of select Caddies. According to a newspaper account, no one took a Yugo.
😭
When Kevin O’Callaghan bought 39 Yugos for his students at the School of Visual Arts in New York to turn into sculptures, the highest price paid was $80. “One guy drove it to my house,” he recalled. “I asked him what he wanted for it. He said: ‘I don’t want anything for this piece of crap. I just want a ride home, and not in that car.’
… Long Island’s Hollywood Motors recently offered a 1998 GV for $6,450.
“This … this is a very, very bad idea,” reads the description. “The thing about bad ideas, though, is that more often than not, they are a lot more fun than ‘good’ or ‘safe” ideas.’” Buying the Yugo, it suggests, is equivalent to drinking flaming tequila shots. The car is now listed as sold.
… owners say the Yugo is less troublesome and more charming than commonly thought. When Mr. Bygrave planned a trip from Ohio to New York, his boss — who owns a Yugo parts store, remember — told him, “I don’t think this is a good idea.” Mr. Bygrave wrote “NYC OR BUST” on the rear window with a craft store marker and headed out in a blizzard.
AH!
Oh 👍👏👐 🎉 to Roy Furchgott of the Times for this fun.
The 1980s model had no tachometer, no indicator for either the headlights or turn signals, no fuel gauge, no rear seat belts, no external fuel door, and drivers had to pour a mix of gasoline and oil directly under the bonnet/hood.[3]
…
The Trabant's build quality was poor,[13]reliability was terrible,[10][11][14] and it was loud, slow, and poorly designed.[3]
…
It took 21 seconds to accelerate from zero to its top speed of 100 km/h (62 mph).[15][16]
The engine produced a very smoky exhaust and was a significant source of air pollution: nine times the hydrocarbons and five times the carbon-monoxide emissions of the average 2007 European car.
… Because the Trabant had no fuel pump, its fuel tank was above the motor so fuel could reach the carburettor by gravity; this increased the risk of fire in front-end accidents. 😂 Earlier models had no fuel gauge, and a dipstick was inserted into the tank to determine how much fuel remained.
Known for its dull colour scheme and cramped, uncomfortable ride, the Trabant is an object of ridicule for many Germans and is regarded as symbolic of the fall of the Eastern Bloc.[19]Known as a "spark plug with a roof" because of its small size, the car did gain public affection.
The Wilipedia caption to this photo: “ Many Trabants like this one, photographed in Leipzig in 1990, were abandoned after 1989.”
American Trabant owners celebrate the fall of the Berlin Wall with the Parade of Trabants, an annual early-November rally held in Washington, D.C.
599,928
Analysts said the British government had concluded that Northern Ireland was crucial enough to risk jeopardizing other relationships, even with the United States.
“Johnson is willing not only to contemplate a trade war with Europe but also to ignore the very strong advice he got from Biden in private,” said Mujtaba Rahman, an analyst with the political risk consultancy Eurasia Group. “He was more than willing to allow the row to overshadow Britain’s coming-out party.”? This is something about Brexit and Northern Ireland.
Mr. Johnson and Mr. Macron had a tense exchange over post-Brexit trade arrangements for the region. British officials are demanding that the European Union change the current system — designed to avoid new barriers between Ireland, an E.U. member state, and Northern Ireland — because it says that checks on some goods flowing from mainland Britain to Northern Ireland are driving a wedge between two parts of the United Kingdom.
...The French president said later he had never questioned “the integrity of the British territory” but insisted that Britain needed to abide by the terms of the deal it signed with the European Union in 2019.
Mr. Johnson, for his part, asked Mr. Macron how he would feel if sausages could not be shipped from Toulouse to Paris.
...
The subject also came up with Mr. Biden. The national security adviser, Jake Sullivan, told reporters that “they had a candid discussion of it in private” and that the president urged the prime minister to protect the Good Friday Agreement, the 1998 accord that ended decades of sectarian violence in Northern Ireland. Tensions over trade have ignited street clashes in Belfast and other cities.
...
...an ugly clash with the European Union over Northern Ireland...dramatizes the long shadow Brexit is casting on Mr. Johnson’s effort to rebrand Britain as a vital player on the global stage. Not only did Northern Ireland poison Mr. Johnson’s talks with President Emmanuel Macron of France, but it also threatens to undermine his relationship with President Biden.
ZERO Tolerance
Sunday, June 13, 2021
COVID-19 BIDEN +142, 143, 144 (June 11, 12, 13)
The boy’s father had slowed cautiously behind. The man on the motorcycle was staying in the lane. When the boy’s father thought it was safe he slowly passed on the left. He and his wife and the boy in the back seat looked at the man on the motorcycle as they drove past.
The boy’s father frantically waved his arm out the car window to get the man on the motorcycle to stop, accelerated quickly to give distance and then stopped the car and got out, waving his arms railroad crossing style.
They put the boy between them in the front seat and the man on the motorcycle in the back. The boy turned and stared at the face of the man with no face. The red perspiration beaded and dripped slowly.
“I’m sorry. I’m getting blood all over your car," the man kept repeating.
Saturday, June 12, 2021
Christians Hate America
‘Take the Ship’: Conservatives Aim to Commandeer Southern Baptists
…an ultraconservative populist uprising of pastors from Louisiana to California threatening to overtake the country’s largest Protestant denomination.
…
Like the Trump movement within the Republican Party, a populist groundswell within the already conservative evangelical denomination is trying to install an anti-establishment leader who could wrench the church even further to the right… For three days [next week at their convention] thousands of delegates known as “messengers” — most of them white men — will fight over race, sex and ultimately the future of evangelical power in the United States.
…
Russell Moore, the denomination’s influential head of ethics and public policy, left on June 1. The popular author and speaker Beth Moore, who is not related to Mr. Moore, announced in March that she is no longer a Southern Baptist, citing the “staggering” disorientation of seeing the denomination’s leaders support Donald J. Trump, and lamenting its treatment of women. Some conservatives triumphantly celebrated both departures.
…
The rebellion in the Southern Baptist Convention both reflects and forecasts what is going on in broader society and the Republican Party, said Jemar Tisby, assistant director of narrative and advocacy at the Boston University Center for Antiracist Research.
…
The denomination has about 14.5 million members but has been steadily shrinking for the past decade. In 2014, about 85 percent of Southern Baptists were white, 6 percent were Black and 3 percent were Latino, according to the Pew Research Center.
Southern Baptists split from their northern counterparts in 1845 in support of slavery…the denomination repudiated its role in slavery in the 1990s…
…
The Conservative Baptist Network, an increasingly influential group founded last year, released a recent video urging Baptists to “stop the drift” by coming to Nashville.
…
[In] audio recordings of meetings [among leaders]…debating how to handle [sexual] abuse [claims]…another high-placed leader, Ronnie Floyd, sa[id] his priority was not to worry about survivor reactions but rather to “preserve the base.” (In a statement, Mr. Floyd apologized and said his remarks were mischaracterized.)
Power
I hate Nicholas Nickleby. It's awful. But it's the only unread book I've had at hand so I've read 400 pages. Still hate it but what else to read?
Aside from that, for I have zillions of other read books at hand, I have been thinking, no, Kristin Labransdatter has stolen on my mind several times in the last few months. I have not picked up the book to re-read it. Ugh.
This past week The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber came to mind for some reason. I read the Wikipedia entry on it, I remembered the story very well, I had not remembered all of the psychoanalyzing by the critics that went on over it.Margo wanted to be dominated? Really? I hadn't remembered that. Sexual power, courage, cowardice, men emasculated, women emasculating them, apparently women wanting men to stop women from emasculating men and to dominate them, it is all such a goddamned tangle, men and women. This was one of the times Kristin Labransdatter stole on me, there was quite a tangle there as I remembered but didn't remember in detail so, last night, I took Kristin off my fucking bookshelf and put it on my desk to read in the morning. But when I got up I felt the need to re-read Macomber. Took Hemingway's collection of short stories down and re-read it. The synapses fired like machine guns.
Margot wants to have something on a man, first note I wrote. Oh that's what it was in Kristin! That's why I made the association of Kristin and Macomber in my mind. Margot gets something on Robert Wilson: Wilson and Francis were chasing water buffalo from a motor vehicle, not permitted, Wilson would lose his guide's license if the authorities found out. When Wilson explains this to Margot, "Well," said [Francis], and he smiled for the first time all day. "Now she has something on you." Kristin had to have something on Simon and on her father, Lavrans (not so on Erlend). Sigrid Undset took this tangle, unwrapped it, wrapped it again tight, partially unwrapped it, did everything you could do with a tangle.
I thought...Kristin doesn't want a man to have something on her: Simon-second note. Yes, that was Kristin's twist on the tangle. Different from Margot's. Sort of. One's Norwegian, one's American. Both are women though. Misogynistic writing? But Kristin was written by a woman and is MUCHHHH more tangled than simple, murderous, American Margot.
She wanted Simon to save and protect her and Erlend but knew that she now owed him and hated that. She knew this only deep down. She then repaid, got back at, Simon.-third note.
Both women make men their thrall, "put man in a bottle," but not with sex--is it ever really sex?, Isn't sex power by other means?-fourth note. "Por um homem na garrafa”, put man in a bottle is a phrase that some African women use to describe how sex gives them power over men. What is a man before sex? A fucking irresistible force, a fucking lion. What is a man after sex? Asleep.
I then noted this remembrance: Kristin resented and maltreated Erlend, drove him away, but she was in his thrall; she needed--had to have--sex with Erlend.
That is a big difference from Margot Macomber and the African tribal women. The woman has to have the sex. Kristin's mother was the same way with Lavrans! So where's the power of the pussy?, there is no pussy power in Kristin, there is dick power. The power play that's most going on in Kristin is the power of compromising men by accepting aid and giving aid. In Macomber the power is mostly female-on male sexual (But not entirely. Margot uses compromising information also). In Kristin, the sexual power is female.
I started reading the dog-eared pages of Kristin--I got up at 6:30 a.m. to do this.--came across the Big One, Simon coming to Oslo where Kristin was shacking up with Erlend in a brothel, to take Kristin back to Lavrans for Lavrans' honor, not hers, fuck her honor. Oh lord yes.
P. 165: Simon gets something on Erlend, the secret tryst, Simon humiliates Erlend before Kristin's eyes, standing right there. Simon showed himself the better, braver man--Simon says the word "coward"[double underlined]-- [the theme of Macomber]--Kristin sees it and Kristin hates Simon for it. Simon does this for Lavrans honor's sake and tells Kristin she must never tell Lavrans.-note. In Macomber, Francis asks Wilson not to tell anyone about his cowardice with the lion (self-protective). Wilson asks Margot not to mention that they were chasing buffalo in a vehicle (self-interest). In Kristin, Simon asks Kristin never to tell Lavrans about the tryst (other-protective).
I turned the page and was reading Simon saying to Kristin, "how little you understood, you his womenfolk, what a man Lavrans is. Knows not how to rule you...he was born to rule over men."(Undset's emphasis)
My eyes glanced to the facing page where I had written in the margins "others" "others" "others" "others" four times in little over the same number of paragraph. Ah. Another difference with Macomber. The characters in Kristin are always acting, on the surface, on behalf of "others," others interests, others honor. It's not straightforward self-interest like those blockhead Americans. Undset gives this others-centeredness a self-interested twist. The characters in Kristin process, e.g. "Simon is saving Erlend from the gallows" as a burden. "Now, I'm in his debt"! It's fucked up.
In a note this morning: Before the above scene Erlend says Kristin is "afraid" and he has never seen her afraid before. (164) Francis Macomber was afraid of the lion and ran. After Francis coolly killed two of the three water buffalo the next day as Margot watched she says, "I hated it. I hated it. I loathed it." The ride on the chase was "frightful. I've never been more frightened in my life..." The fright was seeing her husband act courageously and her relative power diminished.
If a person has power over others he or she can exercise his power and dominate others. Or she could withhold the direct exercise of power, hold it in reserve, but it’s still his. To be sexually desired is to have power. If a person wishes to augment her relative power she can acquire more. Or she could decrease the other's power. If a person has power that he or she does not wish to have, if he wishes to be dominated he could surrender his power.
Margo Macomber had sexual and psychological power over Francis and dominated him. She exercised her power too greatly. Margot's affair with Robert Wilson was a too great exercise of her power; it led to rage-induced courage in Francis and she hated him for it. She had lost relative power by increasing his. It freed Francis. "I've never felt any such feeling."..."You know I don't think I'd ever be afraid of anything again."..."Something happened in me after we first saw the buff..."...Like a dam bursting..." "You know something did happen to me. I feel absolutely different." Francis does not even fear death now. He was too far gone now, Margot had to kill him.
Sigrid Undset inverts the typical sexual power relationship. It is the men, Erlend Nikulausson and Lavrans, who held sexual power over Kristin and her mother. Lavrans had moral power over "men" and over his wife. But Kristin would not be "ruled" by Lavrans. She had no sexual power over her father but she boomeranged Lavrans' moral power back on him. Kristin felt guilty for not being sexually pure and for betraying Lavrans' honor in the Oslo brothel. Guilt gives another person power over you. In Kristin's case in the Oslo brothel Lavrans had power he didn't know he possessed. Kristin knew, her felt guilt is power that only she (and Simon) knew Lavrans had over her. So she revealed it, wounding Lavrans, thereby diminishing his power over her, relatively increasing her share of the power between them.
When Simon's infant son (and Kristin's nephew) is dying Kristin goes and stays with Simon to help and comfort him. She stays eight days. When she makes preparations to leave Simon makes vehement attempt to dissuade Kristin but does not physically stop her from going.
"But if you would not that I should make trial of this last shift of all--"
He stood...with bowed head, and made no answer. Thereupon she said again--and knew not that a strange, nigh scornful half-smile had come about her white lips:
"Would you that I should not go?"
He turned his head aside, and she went by him...
...This child she would save...(original
emphasis)
For you too, Simon Darre, when the dearest thing
you owned on earth was the stake, took at my hands more than a man may
take with honour unabated--(emphasis
added)
"Would you that I should not go--?", she
repeats to herself what she said to Simon.
And he had not been man enough to answer.
She "would" save this child--to make Simon her thrall. Simon "took" from her--in saving Erlend from execution!--more than an honorable man may take from a woman. That is so fucked up. I came to detest the character Kristin Labransdatter because of this.
"Rule;" "over men". Lavrans was impotent or had performance anxiety or something with Kristin's mother early in their marriage. The mother was a c.d.b. So, is Undset writing here that Lavrans was impotent to rule over women? Hemingway is interpreted by some to write that Margot needs to be dominated, ruled; that she both likes and loathes her power over Francis. On the surface, likes her power over him; just below the surface, is contemptuous of his allowing her to dominate him and secretly wants to be dominated. "Why don't you order her to stay?" behind, Robert Wilson, who hours before has fucked Margot, asks Francis before they go out to hunt water buffalo. But Margot’s need to be dominated doesn’t prevent her from blowing Francis’ brains out from the motor vehicle on the buffalo hunt so I don't know about that dominance interpretation.
Thoughts: I am so glad I am post-sexual, and If there is reincarnation I hope I come back as a fag.
How's your day been going so far?







.jpg)






