Monday, March 18, 2024

On Cuckoldry III

-Chapter-

Strict meaning gets blurred in art and history as it does in life. In Victorian times, in England and on the continent, it was not unheard of for a wife, especially a younger "trophy" wife to have secret liaisons with friends of her husband who she met in the marital home, and with the servants. It was aristocratic privilege. 

In Eyes Wide Shut a debonair man hits on...I forget her name, some famous, gorgeous actress, saying,

“You know why women used to get married. It was the only way they could lose their virginity and be free to do what they wanted with other men. The ones they really wanted.”

That's like the only thing I remember from that movie. But that's aristocratic privilege. It was an invitation to cuckoldry but the woman declined.

In somewhat earlier times Winston Churchill's wife had a "fling" on a trip abroad. Also privileged behavior of the elite class. Was Churchill a cuckold or a wittol? Since his wife admitted it (I don't know if at the time), he was accepting of it as s.o.p. Aristocratic privilege.

There is a much older painting, I forget who the artist was, or the title, that depicts the ambiguity between cuckold and wittol.


                                                          Detail. Enhanced.

She is handing her older “eyes wide shut” husband, I presume, his eyeglasses so that he can observe her nude with a dashing young lover. She is taunting him. His body language gives it away. It's not the modern practice of "watching the wife" have sex with another man. The old man is a grudgingly accepting wittol, the same as may be in the Curb Your Enthusiasm episode.

This theme, and to be precise, the theme here is the husband who has no choice but to accept and who is taunted by his wife, is also present in The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber. Margot Macomber has had lots of affairs, is on a safari with her husband Francis, and has an affair with their white hunter guide. "You promised there'd be none of that if we went on this trip," Francis whines. "Well, there is now", Margot breezily and cruelly answers. "You think I'll put up with anything.", Francis rejoins with heat. "I know that you will, sweets."

One of Hemingway's closest associates, maybe an editor, said that Margot was meant to symbolize the "bitch American wife" and the story was metaphorically about "Man free of women." (?) How could that be? The story ends with Francis' death; Margot killed him, it is ambiguous whether accidentally or deliberately. I had always interpreted the story as Hemingway asserting the ultimate triumph of woman over man.


"Clytemnestra after the Murder" (1882)

                                                          Another artist's depiction.

 

                                                       Detail from Collier.


A bitch Margot Macomber was, a cuckolding bitch,  a wife she was, and an American she was. Was Margot Macomber a type?

In The Pioneers, for the record, the first American novel written by an American about American life, James Fenimore Cooper has the heroine, nee Elizabeth Temple, say to her husband,

"You know, Effingham, that my father has told you that I ruled him and that I should rule you. I am now about to exert my power."

Power. Power, Liberty and Independence were the themes, the obsessions of the American Revolution. John Adams wrote, 

"In Europe power grants charters of liberty; in America liberty grants charters of power." 

The sexual imagery in the pamphlets of the American Revolution is impossible to miss and Bernard Bailyn, the preeminent authority on that literature, did not miss it. Liberty was "hunted", "violated", "pure". Power was male to the Founding Fathers; Liberty was female. They would reverse the relationship and put the woman on top. 

Liberty. Chaucer, a man, wrote The Canterbury Tales for a nobleman patron. Alison, the narrator of The Tale of the Wife of Bath ("Tale" is pun on "Tail" I am convinced) has become an instantiation of female power and liberty. Alison states to her husband, who she has cuckolded and who complains,

Have thou ynogh, what thar thee recche or care
How myrily that othere folkes fare?
For certeyn, olde dotard, by youre leve,
Ye shul have queynte right ynogh at eve.
He is to greet a nygard, that wolde werne
340 A man to lighte his candle at his lanterne;
He shal have never the lasse light, pardee,
Have thou ynogh, thee thar nat pleyne thee.

You get all the cunt you want. What do you care if I get pleasure and give pleasure to other men? Don't be a niggard with cunt.
...  

What eyleth yow to grucche thus and grone?
450 Is it for ye wolde have my queynte allone?
Wy, taak it al! lo, have it every deel!
Peter! I shrewe yow, but ye love it weel;
For if I wolde selle my bele chose,
I koude walke as fressh as is a rose

You want my cunt all to yourself? Well, take it! But satisfy it, Peter, or I'll sell it to someone who will. Alison was married five times.

The root of libertinism, "disregard of authority or convention in sexual or religious matters" is liberty.

Independence. When women achieved financial independence, through inheritance, or entry into the work force, they were no longer dependent on their husbands as breadwinners. This empowered them and gave them liberty, "freedom from overarching authority".

It is important to note that not all cuckolding wives in the arts are portrayed as "Bitch wives". Alison is a charming, funny, heroine, "rare as a unicorn" (see immediately below). Even in the paintings, where the husband is the "victim" the treatment of the wife is often humorous, not condemning.

We Americans are sons and daughters of Mother England. We killed our mother. Five hundred and eighty years, a change in gender of authors and a change in religious influence from Protestantism to Judaism, and here came Erica Jong:

I was not against marriage. I believed in it in fact. ...But what about all those other longings which after a while marriage did nothing much to appease? The restlessness, the hunger, the thump in the gut, the thump in the cunt...

...
Even if you loved your husband, there came that inevitable year when fucking him turned as bland as Velveeta cheese: filling, fattening even, but no thrill to the tastebuds, no bittersweet edge, no danger.

...my fantasy of the Zipless Fuck. The zipless fuck was more than a fuck. It was a platonic ideal. Zipless because when you came together zippers fell away like rose petals, underwear blew off in one breath like dandelion fluff. Tongues intertwined...The zipless fuck is absolutely pure. It is free of ulterior motives. There is no power game. The man is not ‘taking’ and the woman is not ‘giving.’ No one is attempting to cuckold a husband or humiliate a wife. No one is trying to prove anything or get anything out of anyone. The zipless fuck is the purest thing there is. And it is rarer than the unicorn. And I have never had one.

Ho-ho-ho. That is a fantasy! “Oh excuse me ma'am, I just ran into your cunt with my dick.” It’s also a "power game." Jong's "fantasy" is one where women are not accountable and not responsible for anything; where they have no power, not the willpower to exercise physical power, where sex “just happens”, there's no agency, it's nobody's fault, "I didn't intend to cuckold!", there's no shame or guilt, I didn't even get undressed! my underwear just "blew off". "I got drunk and it...I don't know what...just happened." No giving, no taking: What does Jong mean by that? That there was no rape. There’s no consent either. “It just happened.” That’s a juvenile fantasy. Jong has been married four times.

Danger. It is a turn-on. The fear of getting caught. It is essential to the psychology of cuckolding. The woman has to get away with it but...the closer to danger she comes, the greater the thrill, the more intense the orgasm with the other. My ex-girlfriend Mindy once told me that at a boozy party that she attended with her husband some guy grabbed her ass. A short-time later she grabbed another guy's ass. She was with her husband at this party.
 
A childhood friend of my (second ex) wife did some modeling (fashion not nude) when she was younger, still married. That led to an affair with the photog. The affair was of some duration when Beth invited the photog to her house with her husband present. Giving the photog a tour of the house Beth took him upstairs and began groping him and spreading on the marital bed.

In Breaking Bad, the husband and wife have sex in the car outside a school. "Why was that so good?," the wife asks after. "Because it's illegal," the husband answers. 
 
Louis CK explores the acceptance of gay sex, even marriage, and wonders, "Wasn't more fun when it was illegal?'

Yes, danger is a turn-on. For the cuckolding wife, it's not as thrilling if the husband goes along with it, as Churchill apparently did. If the husband doesn't care, he devalues the wife, she's not worth it, she's not worth killing or beating or divorcing. Or even revenge cheating on. "You're not worth it." Talk about deflating! Definitely not what the wife expected--or wanted--no psychological out-witting. "I don't even get any jealousy? Not even a leetle?" "No, you're not desirable enough." OWIE! Couldn't have an O with her boy toy after that one. (p.s. Nancy Pelosi said she didn't want to go ahead with Trumpie's first impeachment, "He's not worth it." It hurt Trumpie's feelings.)

Hemingway's friend said that Margot Macomber had no respect for Francis, that what she wanted was for him to be man enough to stop her cuckolding. How, by beating her? Killing her?  I don't know about that but that's what the man said. The idea would be, if that was Hemingway's intent, that the cuckolding wife doesn't want to cuckold her husband again, but that she was powerless to stop herself. How about a chastity belt?
That painting is The Pack Saddle. According to one explanation,

“… an artist…painted an ass (animal) on his wife as a test of her fidelity, reasoning that any extramarital activity would smudge or erase the painting. The man who cuckolded him, however, repainted the ass, adding a pack-saddle on the animal.”

So that didn’t work. It wouldn’t have worked with Margot. It transforms cuckoldry into a game where the husband participates. That's not cuckoldry.

I do however find support for the notion that a cuckolding wife has contempt for her husband and would respect him more if he stopped her.
That photograph is titled Lord and Lady Randolph Churchill. 1) Lord, first 2) Lady, second. So Lord Randolph is sitting in drag? Have you ever seen a more acute portrayal of male subservience? Even the lap dog has a more elevated position than the husband.

My ex-girlfriend, Mindy, successfully (i.e. secretly) cuckold her husband. She also withheld sex from him. She told me that when they would get into bed together she would say, "There's an imaginary line down the center of the bed. Do not cross it!" I know that that story is true because she said the same thing to me!
 
Did she want her husband, or me, or both, to "be man enough" to force her, to rape her? Which is exactly the question Louis CK asks himself when a woman with whom he did not consummate says, “I was hoping you’d just take it." 

I didn't ask myself Louis CK's question of Mindy at the time, I just took it. But in the few years after I broke up with her I did. I did not force her, I have never forced a woman, I would never force a woman, I broke up with Mindy--but months or a year later, not then--with the line, "This is the happiest day in my life, when you're out of it completely." But at the time, I took it. Did Mindy lose respect for me or Mark for taking it and not “just taking it”? I have never understood rape. I could not get an erection if a woman didn’t want to have sex with me. In after-thought I played it out, "Oh that's good, Mindy! The same thing you said to Mark! Now, I could rape you but...you're not worth it." I didn't say that, I have never said that, and I never would say that; I never have had the thought of using the word rape even as a dismissed possibility. 

I read Mindy at the time as not remembering that she had told me that she had used that line on Mark--and Mark never forced her either—and, playing it out still further, I thought years after that if either Mark or I had forced her that she would have Bobbitted us in our sleep, or Macombered us. 

But I did wonder in after-thought what her reaction to being forced would have been. What if Mark had forced her and she had enjoyed it, "Oh yes, beat me, whip me, I've been a bad girl." Since Mark never forced  her, Mark had never forced a woman, and would never force a woman, or even insultingly joke about it, it's one step beyond reality to say what Mark would have done if she had responded with ecstasies at being forced. Would she have wanted him to incorporate it into their sex lives? It is literally inconceivable to me personally. But. there. is. something. to. it. Did you know that some young people role-play "the rape game"? Do you know what FMLYHM stands for? 
 
(more)