The University of Miami Gardens (6-6) played a bowl game today. They played Louisiana Tech (10-3). UMG lost 14-0. The UMG beat writers are going bat shit. And they should be!
But if Pitt (7-5) loses to Eastern Michigan (6-6)--and the Panthers have never led in this game--is that worse than UMG's loss? Look at Tech's record. Look at UMG's record; Look at EMU's record. Then look at Pitt's record. Louisiana Tech was a good team this year playing in a shit conference. EMU was a .500 team playing in a shit conference. On that metric alone a Pitt loss would be more embarrassing, more completely fucking unacceptable. But outside two Pittsburgh Post-Gazette writers and the brain-damaged message board lurkers, and Sports Illustrated--aside from them!...Alright, I can't make the case based on "informed opinion" for the UMG loss being worse because of the OBVIOUS talent disparity between 4-star UMG and 3-star Pitt. (I saw a graphic that UMG has 33 4- and 5-star athaleets on its roster and LaTech has 1. If Pitt has had 33 4’s and 5’s in the last five years combined, then I am a motherfucker. But no matter. Pat Narduzzi turned all of his 3’s into at least 4’s and prolly some 5’s like he was Pat Fucking Riley and these rough-born diamonds have been polished and they glitter and they litter the All-American teams, crowded the Heisman dais and will dominate the first round of the NFL draft. According to those DUMB ASSES.) I can only make the case that one idiot blogger who shall go unnamed thought those cognoscenti MOTHERFUCKERS WERE SMOKING CRACK when they had Pitt going 10-2 and playing in the Orange Bowl. But, modesty is becoming and I therefore defer to my betters. A Pitt loss to Eastern Michigan would be WORSE THAN MIAMI'S LOSS TO LATECH!...And as I finish and say good night sweet princes and princesses, EMU leads Pitt 27-20, 10:45 left in the game.
But if Pitt (7-5) loses to Eastern Michigan (6-6)--and the Panthers have never led in this game--is that worse than UMG's loss? Look at Tech's record. Look at UMG's record; Look at EMU's record. Then look at Pitt's record. Louisiana Tech was a good team this year playing in a shit conference. EMU was a .500 team playing in a shit conference. On that metric alone a Pitt loss would be more embarrassing, more completely fucking unacceptable. But outside two Pittsburgh Post-Gazette writers and the brain-damaged message board lurkers, and Sports Illustrated--aside from them!...Alright, I can't make the case based on "informed opinion" for the UMG loss being worse because of the OBVIOUS talent disparity between 4-star UMG and 3-star Pitt. (I saw a graphic that UMG has 33 4- and 5-star athaleets on its roster and LaTech has 1. If Pitt has had 33 4’s and 5’s in the last five years combined, then I am a motherfucker. But no matter. Pat Narduzzi turned all of his 3’s into at least 4’s and prolly some 5’s like he was Pat Fucking Riley and these rough-born diamonds have been polished and they glitter and they litter the All-American teams, crowded the Heisman dais and will dominate the first round of the NFL draft. According to those DUMB ASSES.) I can only make the case that one idiot blogger who shall go unnamed thought those cognoscenti MOTHERFUCKERS WERE SMOKING CRACK when they had Pitt going 10-2 and playing in the Orange Bowl. But, modesty is becoming and I therefore defer to my betters. A Pitt loss to Eastern Michigan would be WORSE THAN MIAMI'S LOSS TO LATECH!...And as I finish and say good night sweet princes and princesses, EMU leads Pitt 27-20, 10:45 left in the game.
