Tuesday, April 17, 2018

Miami-Philadelphia: The Lessons

What have we learned? Any lessons we can take from the first two games of this series? Yes. We have learned that the team that scores the most points in basketball wins.

We have learned that Erik Spoelstra really does not trust Hassan Whiteside: 15', 4 points 1/2, 5 rebounds, 1 block, 3 turnovers, 4 fouls, +1. That's ineffectual.

We have learned that Miami can play Pat Riley/Knicks-type physical, shut-down defense. That Justise Winslow in that calling can call Ben Simmons a "pussy ass bitch" after taking a charge and leading the defensive charge for Miami.

We've learned... How Many More Times Can The Heat Do That? (Deadspin) that the answer to that excellent question is probably "less than 3." Less than three more times can 36 year old Dwyane Wade, 26', 28 11/16, 7, 3 assists, 2, 3, +16 (highest plus on the team) carry Miami.

We've learned that injured "Sixers" star center Joel Embiid is itching to get back into action and likely will Saturday if not Thursday. We have not learned what Erik Spoelstra will do with his starting center when Embiid gets back. 

Monday, April 16, 2018

Miami 113 Philadelphia 103. FULL BAKE

A series hasn't begun until one team breaks serve. Miami did that tonight. The next two games are on the shores of Biscayne Bay. Philadelphia just kept throwing it up from distance. And few of them stuck. They finished 7/35, 20%. Just awful. Live by the trey...Yep, die by the trey. Good night to all the ships at sea.
9. 10.4. "Turn out the lights. The party's O-ver."
8. 16.4.
6. 25 secs left.
6. 1:48. No! 8. They took away a Phila basket. 8 point Miami lead, 1:01 left. It'll be "Heat" ball after a "Heat" TO. This cake's about baked.
8! 2:25 left. Phila full timeout. HEEEEAAATTTE!
Back up to 6!
4
2. 98-96. 4:29.
4. 96-92 and Miami calls timeout. 5:47 left. What is the German word for taking joy in one's own pain? Lol "Heat."
The "Heat" lead got up to 16 early in the 4Q. It's down to 6 now with 6:06 left.

Live By The Three, Die By The Three

Through three in Phila, Mia leads the Three-ers 86-75. Phila's three-point shooting has been MIA in this one. After going 18/28, 64%, in Game One, the Three-ers are pert near the Ofers in this one,  4-24, 17%. CRIMINY! It's unbelievable they just keep chuckin' it. Hasn't been cuz Erik has done nothin' artiste like. Young Whiteside started but has played only 15 minutes. D-Wade has 21 for the Heats. Philly's just missin' a ton. They're still in range. If they suddenly find their touch and get 3's in bunches like they did repeatedly in Game One, four threes would give them the lead, they can still win the game.

sean hannity is a michael cohen client
This here basketball savant cum soccer sage cum political potentate has just looked at the brushwork of artiste Erik Spoelstra's masterpiece, The Phiasco in Philly. This is Hassan Whiteside's involvement:

12:00. Whiteside jumped center to open the game.

11:49. Eleven seconds into the game he grabbed his first rebound, a defensive. Score 0-0.

Fast enough for you, Erik?

10:42. A minute eighteen into the game he got his first offensive rebound. 4-3 Heat.

A whole 1:18?!

10:41. First assist. On a Goran Dragic three-pointer. 7-3 Heat.

So in 1:19 he had two boards and an assist on a three.

10:26. First block. 7-3.

1:34 into the game he has two rebounds an assist on a three and a block. Fair to middlin'.

8:20. Block. Whiteside's second. Philly 10-8.

6:24. His first shot, a miss. Philly 17-12.

5:48. Offensive rebound, his second. 19-12.

5:45. Turnover, his first. 19-12

5:29. First basket. 19-14.

At 5:19 Whiteside is subbed out. That is a "normal" substitution of a starter about half way through the first quarter.  So when he was subbed out in the 1Q he two points--1/2--,3 rebounds, one assist, 1 turnover and two blocks but would have exited with a -5+/-. Lies, damn lies and statistics, I don't know what more could be expected of the guy. Of Philly's 19 points when Whiteside was in, nine points were in made three point shots (I know you are an advocate of positionless basketball, Erik, maybe Hassan was supposed to guard the three point arc?), two were free throws (foul not on Whiteside and eight were on at the basket makes, two layups, two dunks, that Whiteside absolutely was responsible for preventing, as he did with his two blocks. Still, 11 of Philly's 19 were not conceivably Whiteside's responsibility. But, he sat for the rest of the 1Q and during his benching the "Heat" re-took the lead and finished the quarter with a robust 35-29 advantage.

2nd Quarter:

8:38. Whiteside re-enters game. That's about a normal reentry time for a starter. Philadelphia led 39-38 when he checked back in.

8:21. First foul.

7:35. 4th rebound (defensive).

7:27. Turnover, second. Philly 41-38.

6:59. Subbed out. Philly 42-40.

NOT a normal substitution. He was done for the half after playing a whole 1:39 of the 2Q. For the rest of the half though, again as in  the 1Q, the "Heat" re-took the lead and closed the half up 60-56.

Third quarter.

12:00. Whiteside started the third. Long-ass break. Almost half the third plus the intermission.

9:10. 5th rebound (offensive). Philly 64-63.

9:10. Missed tip shot.

8:48. Missed alley-oop dunk. Philly 66-63.

8:43. 6th rebound, defensive. 66-63.

7:54. Subbed out after 4:06 of playing time with two more boards and two missed shots with Philly leading 69-63.

In the 3Q while Whiteside played Philadelphia scored 13 points, nine on 3's, one at the rim for 2, one distance undesignated 2. And he was done for the day. Miami was outscored 61-40 the rest of the way. The story of this game was 3's. Phila shot a sick 64% on 18/28. Whiteside in, Whiteside out, the Sixers were Three-ers all game long. Miami's perimeter defenders were game enders. Hassan Whiteside was not one of them.Could he have been? lolol. The "principle of verticality," Steven Adams on Steph Curry:


Lovey dovey turtle dovey on Steph.

Spoelstra had to do something. He decided--the book, this is the standard move--to sub the big guy out to try to get a smaller defender in there who could defend the arc. He tried everybody. Nobody could defend Philly from downtown. And Spoelstra did not blame Hassan Whiteside post-game. Did not say he subbed Whiteside because he was ineffectual. No, I cannot blame Erik Spoelstra for subbing Whiteside out so earlier than normal in the 3Q. The game had turned. It went from a slight Miami advantage at half time to a slight "Sixer" advantage at the time of the substitution.

What I do fairly fault Spoelstra for is reacting as if Whiteside was the problem. One of his explanations was Philadelphia went small. (?) THEY HAD TO GO SMALL YOU IDJIT! THEIR BIG GUY WAS OUT INJURED! The "Heat" had a potentially enormous size advantage on Philly. POUND THE ROCK! Feed Whiteside until he bursts. But see here's the problem. Spoelstra does not trust Whiteside with the game. Whiteside only got four shots. He was spoon fed, not force fed. Spoelstra doesn't trust Whiteside to carry the team offensively. I guarantee you that thought has never entered Erik Spoelstra's head. For all of his advocacy of positionless basketball Spoelstra has Hassan Whiteside firmly nailed to two positions: 1. Offensive garbage collecting/defensive shot blocker, or 2.The bench. Once he takes Whiteside out of a game Spoelstra's angina disappears and he forgets about him. Have Whiteside defend the perimeter a la Adams and Love? Spoelstra'd shoot Whiteside if he saw him out there.When the six point lead became 10 then 12, 15 then 18 all the way to 29 Spoelstra tried everybody and everything except putting Hassan Whiteside back in the game.

Spoelstra may have been able to slow the game down a little by running his offense through Whiteside in the paint and that may have gotten the "Sixers" out of their rhythm on the three point line, but with a 24 second clock you can't slow the game down much. Still, he didn't try. Whiteside had had a pretty decent game when he was subbed out for good in the 3Q. The "Heat's" small ballers sucked but Spoelstra had them trying to match Phila three for three. The "Heat" took almost as many three point shots, 26, as did Philly, but made "only" 12 of them for 46%. 

Sunday, April 15, 2018

Hassan Whiteside played 12 minutes last night? 12?

SPOELSTRA!

That is absurd. Philadelphia was without their starting center. What, did Erik decide to level the playing field for them? Whiteside did not "make the most" of his 12 minutes, that's for sure. Two points on 1/4...Well, he did have six boards which equates to 24 if he had played 48 minutes, two blocks=8 over a full game, but two turnovers, also eight, 1 assist; he was a putrid -16 in those paltry 12 minutes but Josh Richardson was a -30 over 27'. At the end of the first half, during which Whiteside had the majority of his 12 minutes the "Heat" led 60-56. Whiteside was subbed out at 7:54 of the 3Q, at which point the score was 69-63 Philly. Whiteside spent the rest of the game on his backside. Philly's lead grew to as much as 29.  And after the game Spoelstra did not blame Whiteside's performance for the benching. Erik said things happen very fast in games and matchups, need to run oh gag me until I barf.

Erik Spoelstra is a tinkerer. He tinkers. He likes to get his little hands into the machinery and tinker with the parts. He likes to take this part out and put this one in just cuz he can. To Erik, he's not a coach if he doesn't tinker. No Steve Kerr is Erik! No sirree Bob. Last year the "Heat" won 41 games. Erik tinkered that team up to 30-11 over the second half of the season. Got the parts, the "matchups" he liked and finished 30-11. Stupendous job by Erik. Masterer tinkerer. Management liked the team's potential so much they brought near the whole concoction back again this year, at new voluminous salaries. You got everybody back, Erik, just let that thing roll! But no. "Miami has used 25 different starting lineups this season..." (Palm Beach Post). Erik is a tinkerer. I tinker therefore I am. He cannot stop tinkering. He tinkered this team up to 44 wins this year. 44. 3 more than last year. Piss poor job, Erik, PISS poor. Erik has never heard of "If it ain't broke don't fix it," never heard of Voltaire, "The perfect is the enemy of the good," never heard that the power not exercised is sometimes the greatest (that's mine :) ). Erik has heard of "Tinker, tailor, soldier, sailor, rich man, poor man, beggarman, thief." Erik lives by that. Coaches by it. Erik will take the nice, shiny part of the machine that Mickey Arison is paying $22 million per year, and take it out of the machine and buff it and make it all shinier cuz it'll fake the other team out. "Bet they didn't expect that!" You fooled 'em, Erik, hmm mmm, sure did. He's thieving Mickey Arison's money and rusting the biggest, shiniest part of the machine. 

Indy Beats Cleve 98-80; Newcastle beats Arsenal 2-1

Or, as Deadspin put it:

Uhh, The Pacers Beat The Living Shit Out Of The Cavaliers


And, as Piers Morgan put it--Guess...


But...BUT...Arsene Wenger is obviously playing the 2017 Jose Mourinho card, play the reserves in the EPL, save the regulars for the Europa League. Arsenal are in the semi-finals and have a two-leg tie that begins Thursday at Atletico Madrid. Win the Europa League and Arsenal automatically qualify for next season's Champions League. Wenger knows which side his bread is buttered on and if he gives American owner Stan Kroenke Champs League money, the only thing Kroenke is interested in, Wenger will see out his contract (I predict). I do not see Kroenke firing Wenger if he delivers the Champions League for the umpeenth time, Premier League table be damned. That will not sit well with Arsenal fans, AT ALL, but it is clear as crystal that is what Wenger is doing. Speaking of that damned Premier League table Arsenal are a jaw-dropping 33 points off champions Manchester City. 33.

Speaking of the Premier League table, CONGRATULATIONS TO NEWCASTLE! Today was their fourth win in a row and they will be drinking Premier League champagne again next year rather than swigging Coca Cola with the likes of Shrewsbury. All hail Newcastle manager Rafael Benitez. As recently as December 30 when I was in the Bahamas Newcastle were tabbed as the second most likely club to be relegated. Now, my God, they're tenth and have a damn good shot at finishing eighth. GREAT accomplishment for Benitez and the club.

Now as to the "Cavs." Don't be cynical! This isn't the regular season. LeBron James teams just do not lose in the first round of the playoffs. By 18. Or any number. At home. Or anywhere.They haven't since 2012. Personally LBJ had won 21 straight playoff games. No, this is significant. It does not bode well for Cleve's post-season near future. And if they don't make it back to the Finals for a nauseating fourth straight re-do with Golden State that does not bode well for James' long term future in The Land of Mistakes. 

Schadenfreude

My son called me yesterday after the win over Spurs to bemoan what he termed the "lackluster" nature of City's title win this year whenever it occurred, today, or next week at Swansea: no sheer joy, no on-field celebration in front of the home crowd as there was in 2012. He was right. There is nothing better than that. And although we mentioned the possibility of securing the three points we needed by a United loss today it was unemotional math, neither of us thought it worth the emotion of hope. United were not going to lose at home to dead last West Brom. Neither of us thought about the emotion of schadenfreude that would come in to play today if...

In great sports rivalries there is schadenfreude that comes into play. Even if your team isn't playing there is still joy in your rival's loss. If City had beaten United last week 3-2 in a match well-played by a game United squad, there would have been the opposite, some grudging respect for United. There would have been some glory for United in gallant defeat. We wouldn't want that, would we? No we would not and so today's loss by United presented the inverse of the emotions of winning the title at home. We were presented the gift of City winning the title at Old Trafford by United losing in front of its own fans--who booed them off the pitch! Ah, exquisite  joy, that. Rare, unexpected, double joy, winning without even playing by your greatest rival losing, humiliatingly.

No, nothing, not this, not anything, will ever top the frisson of the QPR title win. This though can be savored by its own lights, in the bright light of triumph, and in the dark light of schadenfreude.

From The Guardian:



MANCHESTER CITY ARE CHAMPIONS OF ENGLAND FOR THE FIFTH TIME!

MANCHESTER CITY EPL CHAMPIONS!!!

WEST BROM BEATS UNITED 1-0!!!!

NO! WEST BROM BEAT UNITED! CITY ARE CHAMPIONS! HAHAHAHAHAHA!


It took one half for the Philadelphia "Seven Foot Sixers" to get in gear last night. They did. A four point Miami lead was erased and the "Heat" obliterated 74-43 in the second half.

I saw the entrance to American Airlines Arena from a distance as I was driving downtown last week. These arenas are all shaped like petri dishes with the lids on. "Culture" was on the banner in front of the arena. That's what you do with petri dishes, right? You culture things in them, germs, bacteria, mediocrity.

Saturday, April 14, 2018

I was waiting for my pizza at the neighborhood pizza joint and the Toronto-Washington NBA game was on. Prominently standing out (and he did some standing) in baseline seats (tres expensive) was this guy wearing what I thought to myself was Arab headdress. I started watching him more than the game. Seeing him so into the game, jawing at the refs, it made me laugh. Three times. It was adorable. I figured he was famous so when I got back home I googled "best nba fans arab headdress man toronto." Up he came. Of course he was famous.

He is Nav Bhatia, millionaire Hyundai salesman, philanthropist, "Raptors" fan.








And the only "Superfan" so designated by the NBA.



What Nav is not is Arab. Nor Muslim. Nav is Sikh Indian.

He immigrated to Canada in 1984. Nav Bhatia, Superfan, super man, here's to you. "We The North"! lolol. (If) Only in America.

Tottenham Hotspur 1 Manchester City 3 FULL TIME

SPURS 1 CITY 3 79'!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Law Is Coming. What Can It Do When It Gets to Trump?

There is not much guidance on this. There is the Constitution, a couple of cases and Department of Justice guidelines.

The Constitution, may the Framers burn in Hell, provides that,

"The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."
-Article Two Section 4.

Being a constitutional literalist for the moment I do not see Article Two, Section 4 barring a criminal prosecution of a sitting president. What if he was convicted in the criminal courts and then impeached by the House and convicted in the Senate? But, now a textualist, the context is all criminal. It is reasonable to interpret Article Two Section 4 as granting a sitting president immunity from criminal prosecution in the courts with the only remedy impeachment and it is my understanding that Article Two Section 4 has been interpreted as granting immunity from criminal prosecution.

Neither does Article Two Section 4 prescribe the criminal conduct temporally. What if it occurred before the president was sworn in? What if he murdered somebody twenty years before and walked? Could he still be impeached? Criminally prosecuted? What if, as in Trump's case, crimes were committed before he was sworn in but not discovered until afterwards? What if crimes were committed both before and after taking office? My understanding is that the temporal does not matter, a president cannot be prosecuted criminally while he sits nor after he leaves office. But I do not think this has been dealt with at all. Do we have any guidance on hypothetical situations like the following? After a president leaves office it is discovered that he murdered someone before, during, or after his presidency? It is hard for me to believe that Article Two Section 4 gives a president immunity for life for all crimes committed during his life. Let's break that down: before his presidency but not discovered until he became president? My understanding is the president could not be criminally prosecuted for the before-presidency murder during his presidency. Could he be prosecuted for a before murder after he left office? My understanding...yes but. But show me a case. You can't. There is no law I am aware of on the question. What if Trump murdered Melania right now, while president? Could not be criminally prosecuted even for murder while president. Article Two Section 4 covers the entire sweep of criminal law from treason down to misdemeanors and provides only for impeachment as the remedy. What if he murdered Melania now but his involvement was not uncovered until after his presidency. I think so but I don't know. Does it matter that the crime was within or without his scope of duties as president? I don't think it matters. If the crime was committed during his presidency, murder (unrelated to scope) or treason (related), my understanding is he cannot be prosecuted criminally while he sits.

What does "criminal prosecution" mean? Indicted? Standing trial? Sentenced to prison? In this context of crimes committed at any time by a sitting president criminal prosecution certainly means the latter two, standing trial and sentenced. In state and federal criminal prosecutions of non sitting presidents a criminal prosecution is deemed to have commenced upon indictment. Article Two Section 4 does not explicitly bar indictment and there is some reason to believe that the Framers did not intend to bar indictment, what they wanted to prevent was a sitting chief executive being taken away from his duties by having to attend his own criminal trial. Department of Justice guidelines since 2000 provide that a sitting president "should not" be indicted. But Walter Dellinger, head of DOJ's Office of Legal Counsel from 1993-96, thinks a sitting president "could be" indicted, just not tried in court. Walter suggests Robert Mueller ask the office to reconsider. Eh, I don't think Mueller will do that. I don't think a sitting president can be indicted.

State and federal? Yes, state and federal both. For reasons of federalism and from the Constitution itself both state and federal criminal prosecution of a sitting president are barred.

The Constitution does not speak to civil law prosecution, where only money is at stake, only to criminal. Clinton v Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997),in which Walter Dellinger represented Clinton, held unanimously for Jones that a civil suit against a sitting president was permitted, inconvenience to the incumbent be damned.

In the sort-of considered opinion of the undersigned, therefore, what the law can do when it gets to Trump, and by God it's almost there, is sue him in civil court for, e.g., racketeering, conspiracy, anything. Just not criminally, not for obstruction of justice, perjury, nothin'. For crimes, see Article Two Section 4.

Friday, April 13, 2018

Cohen, Trump's Personal Lawyer, Under Criminal Investigation, Court Filing Shows

Trump went particularly Trump over the raid on Conehead's offices. Per the Times, Trump Sees Inquiry Into Cohen as Greater Threat Than Mueller. The criminal investigation into Cohen includes so many things but one that caused Trump to go Full Trump Monday is a report in McClatchy that "Mueller has evidence Cohen was in Prague in 2016, confirming part of dossier." The Steele Dossier. The one Conehead tweeted about “The #Russian dossier is WRONG!”The one Trump has repeatedly called "fake." Prague, about which Conehead tweeted January 11, 2017 “I have never been to Prague in my life. #fakenews.” Which he repeated in sworn testimony before Congress. Which is a crime, lying to Congress. Which is a little peepy crime compared to the others Conehead is under investigation for. But which is a big deal to Trump because:

Michael Carpenter
@mikercarpenter
Follow Follow @mikercarpenter
More Michael Carpenter Retweeted McClatchyDC

Huge development. If Michael Cohen is confirmed meeting Konstantin Kosachev in Prague, then collusion happened. As I [was quoted as saying] in the piece, “everyone knows Kosachev speaks for the Kremlin.” Another tantalizing fact: Russian hacker Yevgeniy Nikulin was also in Prague at this time.

Or as the authors of the McClatchy report put it:

If Cohen met with Russians and hackers in Prague as described in the dossier, it would provide perhaps the most compelling evidence to date that the Russians and Trump campaign aides were collaborating.

And Conehead his own self has ties, as did one time Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort, to Ukraine, part of which now is Russian:

A millionaire with his own New York real estate holdings, Cohen has long had family and business ties to Ukraine. His wife is Ukrainian, and he has had ties to Ukrainian ethanol company. 

The Law is Coming, Trumpie. Don't know how it can git ya, don't think it can, but it gonna try.

Mass Protests Planned If Trump Fires Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein


If...Trump fires Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein or any other officials involved in the Russia investigation, he faces the prospect of hundreds of thousands of activists immediately turning out to protest all over the country.

We're coming, Trump.