I assert the legally-recognized affirmative defense of entrapment on that: The government cannot give a law-abiding citizen a picture of an officer conducting roadside tests AND THEN a picture of Drinking Bacchus AND THEN a picture of a guy holding an umbrella over the president's head...Arright fine! Maybe it's not "legally" entrapment but the argument's the same. Reuters is pretty close to being an agent of the gov...Wait, PLUS, it's legal impossibility: there's ground separating the imbibing cherub and the president's head.  Ha-ha-ha. The defense rests you make me sick.