This is from the Daily Telegraph:
How many times have we seen this, a surprise attack by Islam? That is how they fight! 9/11/01, obviously; the 2005 London bombings; Lee Rigby; Charlie Hebdo; Kurt Westegaard; Theo Van Gogh; the Boston Marathon bombings; the attacks a couple of months ago at the "Draw Muhammad" contest in...Garland, Texas, right?; the Charleston shootings, the Fort Hood shootings; yesterday on the Paris express. That's a few I can remember off the top of my head.
That
is
how
Islam
fights.
We cannot win this war against Islam with fortuitous thwartings of attacks like on the Paris Express. If the Americans had not been in that car on that train, dozens, maybe hundreds of non-Muslims would have been surprise-massacred.
We cannot win this war against Islam with high-tech retail killings of Muslims as with the assassination of Osama bin Laden and the ISIS #2 guy yesterday. Islam as it is practiced and preached today in too much of the world must be destroyed. To win this war against Islam requires the West's leaders to realize that "The Answer is Islam," that there is a war and that that war is against Islam as it is practiced and preached today, not with this one nut or that one nut, not with a generality called "extremism" or "terrorism," not with a "Jay-Vee" team who "misread" the Koran, not even with a three-nation "Axis of Evil" that includes North Korea!, although that gets closer to the truth, and it is certainly not a metaphorical war "for the hearts and minds" of the people of Islamia. To win this war against Islam requires that it be recognized that the war is against Islam (as it is p&p today), that is the first requirement.
Concomitant with the first, not a requirement to win from this time on, but helpful in solidifying the notion in our minds that we are at war with Islam is to face the truth that we are losing this war. Islam has won in that it has changed the soul of America. From confident, outward-looking, we have changed to doubtful, tentative and inward-looking. The American government has turned on the American people. In its defensive, paranoid manner of fighting whatever they label this as, the U.S. government has turned it's methods on the American people and have deprived the American people of their constitution, their right to privacy, their security, their psychic well-being. The soul is mutable but it cannot be changed back by the same defensive strategy of warmaking.
The second requirement to win the war against Islam follows logically from the first: As in any war there must be wholesale, mass, killings of the enemy, that is Muslims who practice what is preached to them. The West, America, must kill enemy soldiers of course, but Islam's soldiers often do not wear military uniforms, they don't have military insignia on their persons or their weapons. The enemy is those who practice and preach much of the Islamic thought in the world so their "uniforms" and "insignia" are the common dress of Muslims in the Muslim world. That is, the enemy is the Muslim people.
There are over one billion Muslims in the world. Millions upon millions of them must be killed in this war bur of course most Muslims are not the enemy. We can lesson the casualties if we understand our enemy. The Muslims who we are at war against practice guerrilla warfare, use ambush tactics and are quick to reveal themselves upon provocation. "Luring snakes out of holes," is what Mao Zedong called it. It is that war-making strategy that was fought on a retail level in Garland, Texas and at Charlie Hebdo. If only Charlie had been as prepared as was that one off-duty patrol officer in Garland. We must provoke Islam, God knows, it's not hard!, lure our enemy out and then kill them. We thus boomerang their preference for ambush upon them. We can wholesale this boomerang tactic. When the West Bank erupted in cheering on September 11. 2001, American warplanes should have massacred the celebrants. When thousands upon thousands throughout Islamia marched and protested and attacked Western embassies on September 11, 2012, American missiles should have flown and bombs dropped on every gathering in every country. President George W. Bush wanted to attack the Islamic enemy in just this way, in whatever country it existed, after September 11, 2001 but was talked out of it by Defense Secretary Rumsfeld. For the provocation of Islam.
The preachers in the mosques, the teachers in the madrasahs, the congregants and the students of this
Islam, these Islams, these "mainstream" Muslim people, are high value military targets in this war and should be killed without need of further provocation. The mosques should be bombed, the madrasahs should be bombed. Formal declarations of war should be issued against those Islamic states, first if not exclusively Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, that allow and encourage the preachers and teachers of this Islam. There must be "regime change" but it is not as relatively bloodless as state decapitation for this war is with the people of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and with far, far too many of the 1,000,000,000 Muslims in the world. It will be a bloodbath, millions upon millions of Muslims
must be killed. That is war.
Anouar, a volunteer at the local mosque, a simple room wedged between shops, said that El Kahzzani and his younger brother used to attend regularly but did not seem radical. "I can't believe it. I am having trouble coming to terms with the news."
Anouar said "it was not obviously apparent that he had such ideas".
How many times have we seen this, a surprise attack by Islam? That is how they fight! 9/11/01, obviously; the 2005 London bombings; Lee Rigby; Charlie Hebdo; Kurt Westegaard; Theo Van Gogh; the Boston Marathon bombings; the attacks a couple of months ago at the "Draw Muhammad" contest in...Garland, Texas, right?; the Charleston shootings, the Fort Hood shootings; yesterday on the Paris express. That's a few I can remember off the top of my head.
That
is
how
Islam
fights.
We cannot win this war against Islam with fortuitous thwartings of attacks like on the Paris Express. If the Americans had not been in that car on that train, dozens, maybe hundreds of non-Muslims would have been surprise-massacred.
We cannot win this war against Islam with high-tech retail killings of Muslims as with the assassination of Osama bin Laden and the ISIS #2 guy yesterday. Islam as it is practiced and preached today in too much of the world must be destroyed. To win this war against Islam requires the West's leaders to realize that "The Answer is Islam," that there is a war and that that war is against Islam as it is practiced and preached today, not with this one nut or that one nut, not with a generality called "extremism" or "terrorism," not with a "Jay-Vee" team who "misread" the Koran, not even with a three-nation "Axis of Evil" that includes North Korea!, although that gets closer to the truth, and it is certainly not a metaphorical war "for the hearts and minds" of the people of Islamia. To win this war against Islam requires that it be recognized that the war is against Islam (as it is p&p today), that is the first requirement.
Concomitant with the first, not a requirement to win from this time on, but helpful in solidifying the notion in our minds that we are at war with Islam is to face the truth that we are losing this war. Islam has won in that it has changed the soul of America. From confident, outward-looking, we have changed to doubtful, tentative and inward-looking. The American government has turned on the American people. In its defensive, paranoid manner of fighting whatever they label this as, the U.S. government has turned it's methods on the American people and have deprived the American people of their constitution, their right to privacy, their security, their psychic well-being. The soul is mutable but it cannot be changed back by the same defensive strategy of warmaking.
The second requirement to win the war against Islam follows logically from the first: As in any war there must be wholesale, mass, killings of the enemy, that is Muslims who practice what is preached to them. The West, America, must kill enemy soldiers of course, but Islam's soldiers often do not wear military uniforms, they don't have military insignia on their persons or their weapons. The enemy is those who practice and preach much of the Islamic thought in the world so their "uniforms" and "insignia" are the common dress of Muslims in the Muslim world. That is, the enemy is the Muslim people.
There are over one billion Muslims in the world. Millions upon millions of them must be killed in this war bur of course most Muslims are not the enemy. We can lesson the casualties if we understand our enemy. The Muslims who we are at war against practice guerrilla warfare, use ambush tactics and are quick to reveal themselves upon provocation. "Luring snakes out of holes," is what Mao Zedong called it. It is that war-making strategy that was fought on a retail level in Garland, Texas and at Charlie Hebdo. If only Charlie had been as prepared as was that one off-duty patrol officer in Garland. We must provoke Islam, God knows, it's not hard!, lure our enemy out and then kill them. We thus boomerang their preference for ambush upon them. We can wholesale this boomerang tactic. When the West Bank erupted in cheering on September 11. 2001, American warplanes should have massacred the celebrants. When thousands upon thousands throughout Islamia marched and protested and attacked Western embassies on September 11, 2012, American missiles should have flown and bombs dropped on every gathering in every country. President George W. Bush wanted to attack the Islamic enemy in just this way, in whatever country it existed, after September 11, 2001 but was talked out of it by Defense Secretary Rumsfeld. For the provocation of Islam.
The preachers in the mosques, the teachers in the madrasahs, the congregants and the students of this
Islam, these Islams, these "mainstream" Muslim people, are high value military targets in this war and should be killed without need of further provocation. The mosques should be bombed, the madrasahs should be bombed. Formal declarations of war should be issued against those Islamic states, first if not exclusively Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, that allow and encourage the preachers and teachers of this Islam. There must be "regime change" but it is not as relatively bloodless as state decapitation for this war is with the people of Pakistan and Saudi Arabia and with far, far too many of the 1,000,000,000 Muslims in the world. It will be a bloodbath, millions upon millions of Muslims
must be killed. That is war.
