Yeah, yeah, yeah, Oh me. Oh, them. 

The Republicans have been saying all day that the Times report is false and just now I saw a headline that "sources on the ground" dispute it also. I have previously written that I do not believe the Susan Rice-Innocence of Muslims story, and my faith in the New York Times has been severely shaken in the last year. I seldom read it anymore. I've only read a tiny portion of that article. So...I believe David D. Kirkpatrick, therefore I believe the New York Times, over the Republicans on this story. "Sources on the ground," are another matter. This will get sorted out and I think Kirkpatrick and the Times will be proved right. They better be. Or at least not proved wrong. They better not be.