Tuesday, June 21, 2016

Then, there's this:

Martin Wolf, the economic columnist of The Financial Times, wrote that “this referendum is, arguably, the most irresponsible act by a British government in my lifetime.” Summarizing the nearly unanimous opinion of economists that a British exit — “Brexit” — would be followed by a major shock and permanent loss of growth, he concluded: “The outcome might well prove devastating.”
...
If the Remain campaign loses, “the chances of him staying on are pretty remote,” Professor Bale said. “He will go down as the person who miscalculated, taking us out of Europe almost by mistake, and then shuffled off the stage” in “a pretty ignominious exit.”
...
If the Remain side loses, both Mr. Cameron and his deputy, the chancellor of the Exchequer, George Osborne, are likely to be gone within months, Mr. Lewington said.

That's from THE NEW YORK TIMES, "Brett" "Arends," THE QUASI-OFFICIAL NEW YORK TIMES. Of America. Maybe you're not American, maybe you're British...you actually read British BUT I'VE NEVER KNOWN THE American QUASI-OFFICIAL NEW YORK TIMES TO BE WRONG AND BAYWATCH OR WHOEVER YOU WRITE FOR TO BE RIGHT!

What about this, even though it's only from America, Mr. Arends? Martin Wolf sounds plenty British, maybe he's not I don't know, but HE COUNTS if he writes for the Financial Times, and Martin Wolf says it's an irresponsible act of the British GOVERNMENT! "Major shock," "permanent loss," "devastating," IT SOUNDS LIKE MARTIN WOLF IS WRITING ABOUT THE GOLDEN STATE "WARRIORS," Mr. Arends, maybe you don't know who that is, it sounds REALLY BAD! And Professor Bale, maybe you know who that is, says Cameron's chances are "pretty remote" if Remain loses. I don't know, call me a dumb American, I think if the British Prime Minister loses his job the cause of that is not a SHAM.