UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EVERY DISTRICT OF EVERYWHERE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff
v
BENJAMIN HARRIS,
Defendant (In proper person)
DEFENDANT'S PRO SE MOTION TO WITHDRAW OATH.
COMES NOW THE DEFENDANT, BENJAMIN HARRIS, in proper person, and moves this Honorable Court for an Order permitting him to withdraw his Oath not to use the f-word during Lent and in support thereof avers as follows:
1. Defendant is unknowledgeable in the law and entered into said oath without benefit of counsel or intoxicating beverages.
2. Counsel for the Defendant was incompetent.
3. Said oath was not entered into freely and voluntarily by Defendant nor with the requisite forethought nor the requisite clarity of mind but rather "on the spur of the moment" when Defendant was without the spur of necessary mental stimulants.
4. At the time Defendant swore said oath he was under the influence of not being under the influence of intoxicating beverages, was almost asleep (see attached transcript: "snore") and ran his words together (see attached transcript "...iwillnotisethef-word...").
5. Defendant is not unmindful of the costs of the administration of justice in this matter and by way of apology for any inconvenience occasioned by the this cause offers to take any remunerative measures deemed not inappropriate directly to the Honorable Judge's Chambers in a discrete manilla envelope.
6. Defendant greatly regrets this oath.
7. Six weeks is a long time.
8. Defendant doesn't think he can make it.
9. What are the consequences anyway?
Respectfully submitted with fingers crossed,
__________________
Benjamin Harris, Defendant, in proper person.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff
v
BENJAMIN HARRIS,
Defendant (In proper person)
DEFENDANT'S PRO SE MOTION TO WITHDRAW OATH.
COMES NOW THE DEFENDANT, BENJAMIN HARRIS, in proper person, and moves this Honorable Court for an Order permitting him to withdraw his Oath not to use the f-word during Lent and in support thereof avers as follows:
1. Defendant is unknowledgeable in the law and entered into said oath without benefit of counsel or intoxicating beverages.
2. Counsel for the Defendant was incompetent.
3. Said oath was not entered into freely and voluntarily by Defendant nor with the requisite forethought nor the requisite clarity of mind but rather "on the spur of the moment" when Defendant was without the spur of necessary mental stimulants.
4. At the time Defendant swore said oath he was under the influence of not being under the influence of intoxicating beverages, was almost asleep (see attached transcript: "snore") and ran his words together (see attached transcript "...iwillnotisethef-word...").
5. Defendant is not unmindful of the costs of the administration of justice in this matter and by way of apology for any inconvenience occasioned by the this cause offers to take any remunerative measures deemed not inappropriate directly to the Honorable Judge's Chambers in a discrete manilla envelope.
6. Defendant greatly regrets this oath.
7. Six weeks is a long time.
8. Defendant doesn't think he can make it.
9. What are the consequences anyway?
Respectfully submitted with fingers crossed,
__________________
Benjamin Harris, Defendant, in proper person.
