That is a psychologically-revealing editorial. That's the end of it, the Gary Kasparov paragraph. How do they imagine America 2.0 if Trump wins?
They don't say, do they? Beyond "catastrophe." Psychologically, it would be too painful. "The fate of the Republic rests upon our shoulders," "the fate of the world is teetering," it would be a "catastrophe," but the details are too psychologically painful to recount. The Times' editors are right on everything they wrote, and on everything they feel.
They don't say, do they? Beyond "catastrophe." Psychologically, it would be too painful. "The fate of the Republic rests upon our shoulders," "the fate of the world is teetering," it would be a "catastrophe," but the details are too psychologically painful to recount. The Times' editors are right on everything they wrote, and on everything they feel.
